For our society to prosper, it needs to be more egalitarian

While the sentiments expressed by “We’re all in this together” and “Alone Together,” among others, are undoubtedly sincere, one has to wonder what will happen once the current pandemic ends and we’re in recovery mode. Great unifying catchphrases have the habit of fizzling after the crises have passed. Significant challenges wait. History tells us not to expect post-pandemic burdens to be shared equally unless we proactively develop strategies now to address the inequalities.

First and foremost are the front-line medical workers, farmers, truck drivers, public and private services-industry personnel (trash pickup, transportation, food delivery, etc.), first responders, law enforcement, educators and so many more that we have recognized as selfless heroes. They’ve kept society functioning despite the risks to their lives and a maze of obstacles in their path.

These people are the true backbone of society in good times and bad. Will we reward them with pay increases that reflect their value to society? Or will the CEOs, executives and others who are in the boardrooms and operate from the comfort of their homes during crises continue to earn disproportionately more than those in the trenches? The past holds the answers: We’ll briefly celebrate our heroes and then it’ll be back to business as usual — or worse yet, pay cuts in some job sectors.

Our post-COVID responses offer tremendous opportunities to rebuild our society on egalitarian principles. Besides taking care of our backbone employees, we face the monumental task of Re-employing America. For these individuals as well, equitable pay must be a priority.

The trillions in federal funds we’ve had to borrow from our future to fight the pandemic loom over us. There are bills to pay and recessionary forces to contend with. So how do we better support and unburden our backbone and other core workers under such circumstances?

We can start with a graduated individual tax similar to what existed during the Great Depression and World War II. Corporate tax loopholes and havens must also be eliminated. We don’t need runaway stock market indices to have a vibrant economy. More wealth in the hands of more people will fuel the economic engine.

Income equality is not the primary objective, however. Financial peace of mind is. Reducing the inevitable financial stresses and despair of a post-COVID world would better serve the public at large and the nation.

Then there’s health care. Obviously, we need to improve our preparations for future pandemics, including facilities that can accommodate an influx of patients and adequate stockpiles of personal protective equipment, medications and other essentials. But we can’t break the bank doing so. Major pandemics are infrequent events. The focus must remain on routine health care and establishing access to medical services for all, equally.

To minimize the probability of instability in the future, we must respect not only the scientists who work tirelessly to improve the quality and length of our lives but also the methods they employ to arrive at truths and make predictions. Yet there are many who rebuff the validity of pandemic modeling, immunizations, human-induced climate change, evolution and other scientifically vetted principles — while all-the-while benefiting from the riches science has brought them. They use their authority to dictate the course of humanity through ill-conceived laws and self-interest, driving an ever-increasing wealth gap and dismantling environmental protections.

We need to minimize their impact through our right to vote, electing instead those who value scientific methods, facts over fictions, and most importantly, egalitarian principles.

Hardships lie ahead in the post-COVID world, but by being in this all together, more equally, with science at our side, our future will be brighter.

Published in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser and StarAdvertiser.com on April 4, 2020

Expand use of nuclear energy to combat global warming

The Amazon inferno, environmental deregulation, lackluster ideas such as the “Green New Deal” – all point to a deepening climate crisis. Meanwhile, the demand for energy grows as rising middle classes in Asia, Africa and South America want and deserve the lives affluent Westerners have had since World War II: a lifestyle largely responsible for our carbon- rich atmosphere today.

Even more fossil fuel (FF) power plants and vehicles are on the horizon. Solar and wind power cannot sate the 24/7 energy addiction of the existing and prospective affluent. The Inconvenient truth Is that we don’t want to inconvenience ourselves to stop global warming (GW). Accordingly, we’re devising Band-aid strategies when triage is needed.

Carbon capture and storage remains an expensive and challenging proposition. Blocking the sun with atmospheric aerosols poses a smorgasbord of unintended consequences. Our circumstances require an all-out assault on the root causes of climate change while simultaneously ensuring uninterrupted energy flow.

One viable option remains, actually an old idea: A mostly-electric world economy using proven nuclear fission power on a global scale – safe, state-of-the-art and smart cookie-cutter reactors built by U.S. and foreign companies working together.

Atmospheric carbon is the enemy. Nuclear reactors produce none. A regulated nuclear power industry poses much less risk to humanity than the continued use of carbon-rich FFs. Since electricity and mobility are the lifeblood of modern society, the nuclear option satisfies our thirst for energy while averting apocalyptic temperature rise or the social and economic chaos of limited FF usage.

The U.S. must take the lead to incentivize the phased transition from FFs to a nuclear-electric economy. Other nations will follow. Most private and public transportation, heating, cooling and industrial activity must run on electricity (air and water travel excepted).

We must help Big Oil transform into Big Nuclear, Big Auto into Big EVs (electric vehicles). Realistically, it’ll take beyond 2050 to phase out most FF usage. Even if only a temporary, century-long stratagem, the nuclear option protects the future and quality of life until another realistic solution emerges.

What about nuclear accidents, terrorism, proliferation and waste? Improved reactor designs have reduced the risk of accidents to insignificant levels. Bolstered security will prevent sabotage and theft of radioactive materials.

Most nations and all terrorist groups lack the wherewithal and resources to pursue bomb development; nations with weapons will prevent the have-nots from pursuing their own. Radioactive waste will be processed, recycled and eventually buried in hardened sites. Deserts may offer ideal burial areas since GW is transforming many of them into hot, dry dead zones. Better dead’ zones than a dead planet. Nations without suitable burial sites will compensate those that accept their waste.

Here in Hawaii, a nuclear power plant is unlikely if the state stays its course to minimize fossil-fuel usage through solar, wind and geothermal energy development. Utrade winds , decline significantly, however, wind power output will drop while electricity demand rises for air conditioning. Accordingly, the state must periodically review its strategy to account for changes in worst-case local warming.

The nuclear option will not stall GW for quite some time. The world must do more: produce and buy high-mileage gas vehicles (again) until EV infrastructure matures; stop running devices 24/7; revitalize solar, wind, geothermal, tidal and hydroelectric power production; stop deforestation; and more.

Most critically, our indifference to the future must end. Climate change denial and scorched-Earth policies will only accelerate and intensify the effects of GW. It’s time for the U.S. to assume a climate leadership role and jump-start the nuclear option. The climate clock is ticking.

Published in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser and StarAdvertiser.com on September 9, 2019

Nonviolent pressure against Syria still viable option

Published in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser and StarAdvertiser.com on
September 04, 2013

The Syrian government’s chemical weapons attack against its own people certainly meets the criteria of crimes against humanity, but how do the proposed U.S. strikes against the Syrian regime stand up to logical scrutiny?

First, let’s assume that the intelligence is right and that the evidence and analysis won’t prove faulty as it did when the United States exposed details of Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) to the United Nations in 2003. If we’re right, our intent to punish the Syrian government for its horrific crimes would seem justifiable, especially if we can successfully target Syria’s WMDs and its WMD infrastructure.

Hypothetically now, suppose that Syria did not use WMDs, but had only bombed its people with conventional weapons, inflicting equally repulsive death and injury to the same noncombatants — men, women, and children. Wouldn’t the bloodied and mangled bodies of the dead and

Continue reading “Nonviolent pressure against Syria still viable option”

Big Oil Drains Our Wallets

Here we go again!

Gasoline prices continue to rise under the maneuvering of oil producers, refiners, and speculators.

Sound familiar? Flash back to 2008 and recall the painful prices at the pump — fueled by the same greed that forced the longer gestating and much broader economic collapse. President Bush and Congress ignored the economically debilitating price rises in petroleum, allowing the oil oligopoly to reap more than $40 billion in windfall profits. Sure, there were expressions of outrage and the obligatory political grandstanding, but no substantive actions occurred.

Continue reading “Big Oil Drains Our Wallets”

Washington Needs a National Strategic Plan

Both the Republican and Democratic candidates for president have campaigns built on the need for change. What exactly do they mean? Aside from targeting lobbyists and special interests, neither candidate has spelled out the details of how to bring meaningful change to Washington. If Washington is as broken as Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain claim, one might conclude that all of our federal elected officials are part of the problem.

Continue reading “Washington Needs a National Strategic Plan”